A Statement to the Anglican Church of Canada from the House of Bishops of Rupert's Land
In the course of our prayers for General Synod in Winnipeg in June 2007, the Bishops of the Province of Rupert’s Land wish to draw the wider Church’s attention to two concerns regarding the resolutions which the Council of General Synod (CoGS) is forwarding to General Synod about the blessing of same-sex unions.
Our first concern is with Resolution #3—“that the blessing of same-sex unions is consistent with the core doctrine of the Anglican Church of Canada”, and thus consistent with Christian core doctrine. In the two months remaining before June, we do not believe that it is possible for members of General Synod—or the broader Church—to undertake the required education and discussion to be in a position to determine whether the blessing of same-sex unions is scripturally sound and theologically consistent with core doctrine. While there has been a huge amount published on these matters from both sides of the question, there is no one Canadian Anglican position paper that we as a Church own and can use to help others engaging this question. If the blessing of same-sex unions is consistent with core doctrine and right, then it is incumbent upon us to help educate Anglicans, and other Christians, in Canada and around the world. Accordingly, we request General Synod to direct the Primate’s Theological Commission (PTC) to prepare a report that answers this important question. This request to the PTC needs to be carefully worded and more comprehensive than the 2004 request about whether the blessing of same-sex unions is a matter of doctrine.
Our second concern is that the set of resolutions which CoGS has drafted does not squarely address the effect of passing those resolutions on our membership in the Anglican Communion. If the blessing of same-sex unions proves to be scripturally sound and consistent with core doctrine, we believe that General Synod needs to develop a vehicle for considering whether it is better for us to stay at the table and insisting on ongoing conversation with all of the other parts of the Communion—particularly those where gay and lesbian relationships constitute illegal or even criminal activity—or to walk away now from our Anglican brothers and sisters, and our ecumenical partners, thereby communicating that “I have no need of you” (1 Cor. 12:21).
We are deeply mindful that these concerns and requests will cause great frustration within the Canadian gay and lesbian community. However, we believe that it is important to be sure of our doctrine, and not to unduly quickly walk away from the international table, especially as the Canadian Church has a unique contribution to make to the Communion in light of the developing experience of civil same-sex marriage within Canada.
We offer these comments in the name of the Risen Christ.
References (1)
-
Alleluia and thanks be to God! I am much encouraged by this statement. Thank you bishops of Rupert’s Land (one of which, I am happy to say, is my own).


Reader Comments (1)
I appreciate the statement from the bishops of Rupert's Land and agree with it's overall thrust. I do find it interesting that the majority of our worldwide communion do believe that same sex blessings is a communion breaking issue. I find it odd that something has to be addressed in the creeds to be core doctrine, as I read the St. Michael's Report saying. The 39 articles seem to be a better place in my mind to start the discussion. Surely scripture, as they contend, which preceeds and gives rise to the content of the creeds, is the proper standard for what is doctrinal in God's church.
Having said that, I believe Paul's point in 1 Cor. 12:21 is that no part of the body CAN say to another, "I have no need of you." Indeed, this is a point foreshadowed in 1 Cor. 3:16-17 which says: "Do you not know that you are God’s temple and that God’s Spirit dwells in you? 17 If any one destroys God’s temple, God will destroy him. For God’s temple is holy, and that temple you are."
It seems clear that what is happenning in the Anglican Communion today is just that - a tearing down of a moment of God's kingdom on earth. And sadly, it seems TEC and the ACC are the ones controlling the wrecking ball. And I fear, true to the words of 1 Cor. that God will follow through with his end of the bargain.